On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly(a)corisweb.org> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:17 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly(a)corisweb.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 15:03 -0600, linuxguy wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 09:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> >> > QUESTION TO DEVELOPERS: Is there any hope of a full KDE 3.5
> >> > in F10, plus an upgrade path from F8 to F10 that preserves
> >> > KDE 3.5 configurations?
> >> >
> >> > KDE 4.0 is incomplete and not suitable for most users.
> >>
> >>
> >> I totally agree ! I was going to post about this but I didn't want to
> >> upset the group. But its true ! F9 is the WORST RH/Fedora release I
> >> have ever used and I've been doing this since RH8.
> >>
> >> I want KDE 3.5 back for F10.
> >>
> >> And don't give me the crap that Fedora is bleeding edge software. F9
> >> is beyond bleeding, its suicidal.
> >>
> >
> > F10 will be out before you know it, and F8 still gets dozens of updates
> > a week. I still can't get that to sit well with me. Are things being
> > accelerated to the point of there being 5 Fedora releases for each RHEL
> > release? Or is EL re-tooling for annual releases, maybe?
> >
> > Andy
>
> Has anything change? Doesn't Fedora still follow it's original 6 month
> release cycle?
Yeah, guess you're right, Arthur. Sure feels quicker to me lately,
though. Don't know why.
Mebbe it's just my brain slowing down.
According to the last announcement made about the releases (public announcement)
A month (or a few weeks) were skipped to get back on track with
schedule. I can't remember the details. So last release cycle was
likely less than exactly 6 months.
When is RHEL 6 supposed to release?
I don't know.
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
(
www.pembo13.com )