On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Mohamed El Morabity wrote:
Le lundi 24 janvier 2011 à 13:55 +0100, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
a solution could be to build an empty RPM that will simply contain a
"Provides: texlive > 2007" or something like this to fool Fedora
packages requiring a LaTeX distribution.
Your idea looks interesting but doesn't work. I've just installed (as
yum localinstall) the rpm generated by the attached rpm and when I try
to install a2ps I get:
Dependencies Resolved
=====================================
Package
=====================================
Installing:
a2ps
Installing for dependencies:
html2ps
kpathsea
tex-preview
texinfo-tex
texlive
texlive-dvips
texlive-latex
texlive-texmf
texlive-texmf-dvips
texlive-texmf-errata
texlive-texmf-errata-dvips
texlive-texmf-errata-fonts
texlive-texmf-errata-latex
texlive-texmf-fonts
texlive-texmf-latex
texlive-utils
Transaction Summary
=====================================
Install 17 Package(s)
Total download size: 61 M
Installed size: 159 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n
That is not what I desire.
The fake rpm is correctly installed:
yum list installed|grep texlive
texlive2010-fake.noarch
1.0-1.fc13 @/texlive2010-fake-1.0-1.fc13.noarch
Any other suggestion?
Walter
--
Walter Cazzola, PhD - Associate Professor, DICo, University of Milano
E-mail: cazzola(a)dico.unimi.it Ph.: +39 02 503 16300 Fax: +39 02 503 16253
· · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·
... recursive: adjective, see recursive ...
· · · ---------------------------- · · · ---------------------------- · · ·