Kevin Fenzi writes:
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 18:10:45 -0700
David Benfell <benfell(a)parts-unknown.org> wrote:
Were you tying your services to specific IP addresses?
I have ten IP addresses, one for each of several domains and subdomains. At
the time I made this decision, SNI didn't work, at least for me, and from
what I can see, it still seems problematic.
I'm curious why this would have changed for you folks so recently.
Was this a bug with systemd-208-19.fc20?
I believe so. It only appeared a few days ago. I hadn't been messing with
any of this stuff, so at first I hoped it was just some weird one-off
problem. The second time, well....
> Which returns us back--and I hope I'm recalling the initial posting
> in this thread correctly--to the beginning of this thread. Do we
> really need this complexity for the sake of a few seconds?
No. We need it for all the other reasons.
Lennarts blog host seems to be having some problem, but from google
cache:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:rm-N94-I044J:
0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Theres tons and tons of things that systemd does well that there was no
way to do in the sysvinit world.
What I see here is mostly stuff I don't understand. I got by just fine
without it. So why, really, do I need it? That explanation appears to be
missing--unless you just automatically choose the latest, greatest, shiny
thing.
--
David Benfell
See
https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the
attachment.