On 5/28/2010 8:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/29/2010 07:56 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 28 May 2010 04:22 PM, David Boles wrote:
>
>> Bittorent sucks. Period.
>>
>>
> I am replying just to disagree with this part of your email.
>
>
>> A question. Bittorent exists because you are supposed to SHARE. Did YOU?
>> share?
>>
>> One down byte / and one up byte is the standard. Did you upload at least
>> as much as you downloaded? REAL men double up. Means? Share up twice
>> what you downloaded. Did you?
>>
>>
> Yes I did, my share ratio is somewhere between 2 and 3. So far I have
> downloaded the XFCE LiveCD, but I was planning to download the DVD even
> though I don't need it. Do you know why? Just so that I can seed. Yes
> people do share. I don't know if you have read all the messages in this
> thread, but there was a poster who shared his DVD download for F12 to a
> share ratio of 400 over the last 6 months!
>
> Bittorrent rulez.
>
>
I also agree with you. I generally keep my bittorrent client running
most of the time. I love that I can share and I love it that I can
control upload/download speeds to have minimal effect on, for example,
watching baseball games.
That makes two. You also deserve congratulations for doing your part.
That makes you part 'two' for two.
--
David