On Wednesday October 13 2010 20:40:05 JD wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB<yehielb(a)mail.ru> wrote:
>> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response.
>>
>> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking
>> about 125 MB of memory, that is a lot.
>> I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that
>> number normal?
>
> Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the
> case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much
> of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by
> other KDE apps on the system.
Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ?
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2480 djyb 20 0 183m 127m 4048 S 0.0 12.7 0:49.64 kglobalaccel
according to top, 127m, I guess that 127MB