Re: mingw32 directories, possible bug?

Hi. On Sun, 01 Jan 2023 13:03:26 -0500 Bill C wrote: > So is it ok to remove these directories? Or the rpms? I don't use mingw at > all. Directly the directories no: the rpms yes (but see below), but this is small: around 600K each on my system. To identify the related rpms, run for example: find /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 -type f | xargs rpm -qf | sort -u On my system this gives: gvnc-1.3.0-5.fc37.x86_64 gvncpulse-1.3.0-5.fc37.x86_64 libosinfo-1.10.0-4.fc37.x86_64 libvirt-glib-4.0.0-6.fc37.x86_64 osinfo-db-tools-1.10.0-4.fc37.x86_64 If you have osinfo-db-tools installed beware, removing it will remove (even with: dnf --noautoremove): gnome-boxes gnome-classic-session gnome-photos libosinfo nautilus tracker-miners Check first if you are using either gnome-classic and/or nautilus. -- francis _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue