Re: 32 bit pam-libs?

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:17:05 -0400 Tom Horsley <horsley1953(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > For a few days now, I've been getting update errors because > (apparently) the 32 bit pam isn't yet in the repos even though the 64 > bit version is newer: They build from the same source package, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2010513 so they should be in sync. Maybe the i686 package isn't getting karma and will only be posted when the karma / testing period expires. [snip] > I'm not sure why I currently have 32 bit pam installed, any drastic > consequences for removing all the 32 bit pam packages? There certainly > doesn't appear to be a vast number of packages dnf wants to remove > if I say erase pam.i686 and pam-libs.i686. If nothing is using it, and the x86_64 version is installed, there should be no consequences. But, I'm not speaking from any experience, just general logic. You could try moving the executable out of the way, and see if there are any consequences. If not, just move the executable back and remove the package. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure