On 4/12/21 1:47 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
2021-04-12 19:12 UTC+02:00, home user <mattisonw(a)comcast.net>:
[... snip ...]
> What good, valid purpose is there for a
> package to have a dangling symlink? Or maybe "hunspell" needs a little
> clean-up?
Probably no and yes. But it's not just hunspell. Far from it!
I was assuming that hunspell was just one example.