On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB<yehielb(a)mail.ru>
wrote:
> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response.
>
> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking about
> 125 MB of memory, that is a lot.
> I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that number
> normal?
Determining how much memory is used by a single PID is tricky. In the
case of KDE, which has a lot of shared code, it's even trickier. Much
of the memory footprint seen in ps might be in libraries shared by
other KDE apps on the system.
Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for
kglobalaccel ?