On Apr 30, 2004 at 00:20, M. Fioretti in a soothing rage wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 17:44:00 PM -0400, ne... (akabi(a)speakeasy.net)
wrote:
> >A link to Netiquette (trim your lines, proper sigs, and bottom-post)
> >at the *top* of the message???
> Considering the amount of top-posters on this list, it might
> be the only way to get them to change.
Sorry, no. The only way to get them to change is to *not* answer to
them, ever, except with polite but firm requests to stop.
I need to learn to insert
smileys more often.
>I suspect that since they top-post, they only read the top part
of
>mail...
That's their problem. Why do you suggest to bore people who behave to
teach the others better manners?
Just to make things clear: sending again screenfuls of already
distributed/downloaded/paid lines is much worse than posting on the
bottom, on the top, laterally, or any combination of them.
I agree with this 110%.
Top posting is just one of the many things to avoid. To me, however,
asking to stop top posting by...top posting seems annoying for no
reason those who don't do it, but also one of the surest ways to make
people laugh at who does it.
I left out the (-: I need to use them more...
Of course, you are free to try that approach. Just don't be
surprised
if you are flamed to death (for top posting!) by all the other list
members.
No thanks. I have long since learnt that it is hard for
ppl to change their ways. Some are so obstinate, nothing
will make them change...
N.Emile...
--
Registered Linux User # 125653 (
http://counter.li.org)
Switch to:
http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653
Be both a speaker of words and a doer of deeds.
-- Homer
16:59:21 up 41 days, 5:31, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00