9:01 p.m.
Hi. I have the apache httpd running, and when I go to my IP from school,
it connects. I was wondering how to configure it to connect say, to
www.{mydomain}.ca. I've tried vhosts, and tried my hostname, but nothing
works.
Thanks,
Richard
9:15 p.m.
On 4/29/2004 10:01 PM, Richard wrote:
Hi. I have the apache httpd running, and when I go to my IP from
school,
it connects. I was wondering how to configure it to connect say, to
www.{mydomain}.ca. I've tried vhosts, and tried my hostname, but nothing
works.
Can you explain exactly what you are trying to do? I am having a hard time to
understand. If you simply want to type an URI with a FQDN
(http://www.domain.com/) and have it go to your machine, you need to have DNS
registered and running or somebody else doing that for you.
Cheers,
--
David
11:04 p.m.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:01:28 -0500 Richard <kholdstare(a)mts.net>
delicately typed the following:
>'ve tried vhosts, and tried my hostname, but nothing
>works.
It would behoove you to maybe get a dynamic DNS hostname. And
assign that to apache, assuming it's not the hostname of your
machine. That way you can connect to it via the domain name
rather than IP.
This will entail you discovering how to get the dynamic DNS
updated as your IP address changes. There are many how-to's for
this. You can dry dyndns.org
Alex White
--
If you understand, things are just as they are; if you do not
understand, things are just as they are. --Spoken in Zen
--
If you understand, things are just as they are; if you do not
understand, things are just as they are. --Spoken in Zen
6:08 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
to Fedora as others have.
Maybe if I waited until Core 3 came along I would have been a little happier??
Anyone please..
---
Ted Gervais,
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia, Canada
6:20 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
Around 12:08pm on Friday, April 30, 2004 (UK time), Ted Gervais scrawled:
I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
to Fedora as others have.
Perhaps you could be a little more specific than "Why it is not as nice
as RH9?". As it stands, your question is no easier to answer than "Why
isn't Ted Gervais as nice as those who voluntarily contribute to Fedora,
or those who appreciate what a fantastic OS they get for free?".
Cheers
Steve
--
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora Core
V_/_ No MS products were used in the creation of this message
12:16pm up 54 days, 20:40, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.15, 0.20
6:31 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
You are right Steve. Sorry for being so vague.
I will have to compile a list to be more exact, but since I just put it on
last night my first impressions were that some of my 'stuff' didn't work
right off. For example, one of my IRC applications didn't come up
anymore. I haven't investigated why, but I am sure it can be resolved.
There is no sound when KDE comes up but maybe that is because there is not
meant to be any in this release??
I do have sound though, as I played some music (on a CD) and that worked
fine. I did read however, that others had problems with their sound. Also
it scattered my icons all over the desktop which was unusual but that can
be fixed. And I guess I can go on. But all in all, while Fedora installed
just fine, it didn't hit me the right way. Maybe Core 3 will look
prettier? I don't know but we do have to move on.
So, all in alll I guess I really don't have a complaint. Other than my
first impressions, I guess I can get over that. But RH9 was really pretty
and nice, plus it did everything I wanted.. Too bad WE had to move..
At 12:20 PM 4/30/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Around 12:08pm on Friday, April 30, 2004 (UK time), Ted Gervais
scrawled:
>
> I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
>
> RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
> because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
> to Fedora as others have.
Perhaps you could be a little more specific than "Why it is not as nice
as RH9?". As it stands, your question is no easier to answer than "Why
isn't Ted Gervais as nice as those who voluntarily contribute to Fedora,
or those who appreciate what a fantastic OS they get for free?".
Cheers
Steve
--
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora Core
V_/_ No MS products were used in the creation of this message
12:16pm up 54 days, 20:40, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.15, 0.20
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
---
Ted Gervais,
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia, Canada
7:05 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
Am Fr, den 30.04.2004 schrieb Ted Gervais um 13:31:
You are right Steve. Sorry for being so vague.
I will have to compile a list to be more exact, but since I just put it on
last night my first impressions were that some of my 'stuff' didn't work
right off. For example, one of my IRC applications didn't come up
anymore.
_Maybe_ this and other failures is because of old config files around.
Did you do a fresh install of RH9? Then I think you cannot compare it to
an upgrade of FC1.
I haven't investigated why, but I am sure it can be resolved.
You could add a test user to see if this one's also having troubles.
There is no sound when KDE comes up but maybe that is because there
is not
meant to be any in this release??
I have just checked it (usually I'm using Gnome): By default there are
no sounds for login and logout. :-)
I do have sound though, as I played some music (on a CD) and that
worked
fine. I did read however, that others had problems with their sound. Also
it scattered my icons all over the desktop which was unusual but that can
be fixed. And I guess I can go on. But all in all, while Fedora installed
just fine, it didn't hit me the right way. Maybe Core 3 will look
prettier? I don't know but we do have to move on.
So, all in alll I guess I really don't have a complaint. Other than my
first impressions, I guess I can get over that. But RH9 was really pretty
and nice, plus it did everything I wanted.. Too bad WE had to move..
If you don't want to, you don't have to. After April 30th
fedoralegacy.org will do updates for RH9.
Christoph
6:30 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
Am Fr, den 30.04.2004 schrieb Ted Gervais um 13:08:
I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
to Fedora as others have.
Maybe if I waited until Core 3 came along I would have been a little happier??
Anyone please..
Can you please tell us:
What's not "nice"?
What's missing?
What's not working?
Christoph
6:34 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
Thanks Christoph for your interest and the others who have responded as
well. I am a bit surprised that anyone has any interest in my
thoughts. Nice that someone cares.
Christoph, I just responded to anothers question on this same issue. My
response is there. Not much of a case though, but I guess just first
impressions weren't the best. My IRC failed to work, and my icons were
splattered around. I guess that is not too difficutl to fix.
Anyways - thanks again Christoph for your question. I had read about
others not being happy too so maybe that is why I blurted out what I did.
At 01:30 PM 4/30/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Am Fr, den 30.04.2004 schrieb Ted Gervais um 13:08:
> I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
>
> RH9 had everything one would want, or at least I was happy with it. But
> because of the support for it disappearing on April 30th I decided to move
> to Fedora as others have.
>
> Maybe if I waited until Core 3 came along I would have been a little
happier??
>
> Anyone please..
Can you please tell us:
What's not "nice"?
What's missing?
What's not working?
Christoph
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
---
Ted Gervais,
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia, Canada
7:06 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
On 4/30/2004 7:08 AM, Ted Gervais wrote:
I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
OT, Ted, please, next time do not use an existing thread to initiate a
completely different one. You replied to the thread initiated with message-id
<1083279152.26378.4.camel(a)kholdstare.kholdstare.ca>, which dealt with "Apache
httpd".
Cheers,
--
David
8:30 a.m.
New subject: RH9 to Core 1
Oooops. I did? Ok. Yes, I did a response to another thread but deleted
the subject. I thought this was an easy way to get going with a new
thought. Thanks for the note on this, as I didn't know this would
happen. Thanks again..
At 08:06 AM 4/30/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On 4/30/2004 7:08 AM, Ted Gervais wrote:
>I just upgraded ? to Fedora Core 1. Why is it not as nice as RH9?
OT, Ted, please, next time do not use an existing thread to initiate a
completely different one. You replied to the thread initiated with
message-id <1083279152.26378.4.camel(a)kholdstare.kholdstare.ca>, which
dealt with "Apache httpd".
Cheers,
--
David
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
---
Ted Gervais,
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia, Canada
9:27 a.m.
Richard wrote:
Hi. I have the apache httpd running, and when I go to my IP from
school,
it connects. I was wondering how to configure it to connect say, to
www.{mydomain}.ca. I've tried vhosts, and tried my hostname, but nothing
works.
Thanks,
Richard
There has to be a DNS entry out there somewhere which point your domain
to your box. Check out http://www.dyndns.org
--
John C. Nichel
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
john(a)kegworks.com
3:53 p.m.
If you want to do that, you have to have a index.html page in
/var/www/html for it to work.
Otherwise,you have to have a registered domain, and you have to have DNS
running for your domian in order for www.yoursite.com to work.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Richard wrote:
Hi. I have the apache httpd running, and when I go to my IP from
school,
it connects. I was wondering how to configure it to connect say, to
www.{mydomain}.ca. I've tried vhosts, and tried my hostname, but nothing
works.
Thanks,
Richard
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
7321
days inactive
7321
days old
12 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Alex White -
Christoph Wickert -
David Collantes -
info -
John Nichel -
Richard -
Steve Searle -
Ted Gervais