Hi,     I got the following messages from a sudo dnf upgrade. Are they indicating that the indicated files need to be updated at the Fedora end? /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/kdm.conf:1: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/kdm/ → /run/kdm/; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/kdm.conf:2: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/xdmctl → /run/xdmctl; please update the tmpfile s.d/ drop-in file accordingly.

On 10/10/21 11:56, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/10/2021 08:45, Stephen Morris wrote: >> Hi, >>     I got the following messages from a sudo dnf upgrade. Are they indicating that the indicated files need to be updated at the Fedora end? >> >> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/kdm.conf:1: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/kdm/ → /run/kdm/; please update the tmpfiles.d/ >> drop-in file accordingly. >> /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/kdm.conf:2: Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/xdmctl → /run/xdmctl; please update the tmpfile >> s.d/ drop-in file accordingly. >> > > Do you actually use kdm as your display manager?  I'm pretty sure it has been depreciated and going forward sddm will > fully replace it.  I've not used kdm in a long time and don't know how well it is maintained. > > You can run "systemctl status display-manager" to verify what DM you're using. > > If it is not kdm, I would "sudo dnf erase kdm". Thanks Ed, I am using gdm as my display manager. I could delete kdm, but I keep it around in case I decide to move away from gdm. I have tried sddm and hated it and I considered kdm to be significantly superior in the user interface, and in my view unless sddm undergoes significant interface development it is not worth using, kdm is far superior.