On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 20:38:31 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: Amazing! I actually found it. ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf had this stuff in it (for years and years and years in order to make fonts look better when fedora was going through a long "spindly" phase for fonts): <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> <fontconfig> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="rgba" > <const>none</const> </edit> </match> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="hinting" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle" > <const>hintfull</const> </edit> </match> <match target="font" > <edit mode="assign" name="antialias" > <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> </fontconfig> Renaming that file allows Oswald to render correctly. What it is about Oswald (and no other fonts I checked) that makes it screw up so badly, I have no idea. It doesn't happen in firefox even though that fonts.conf file would (I imagine) affect it as well.

On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 20:38 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: It may have cached the site in a mangled manner. Look in: ~/.cache/google-chrome/

On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 21:46:47 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: [....] I've been looking and wondering. "dnf install brave" fails with No match for argument: brave Error: Unable to find a match From which (I THINK) Fedora isn't (yet?) supporting it. That implies two questions: is it in the works? and can people running it anyway comment on incidents if any of dependency hell? Fwiw, dnf update on a machine with Opera and Vivaldi installed (by downloading rpms and running rpm -ivh) checks Opera and Vivaldi repos and has been trouble-free so far. -- Beartooth Implacable, curmudgeonly codger learning linux I try to be paranoid, but I just can't keep up.