Re: [Lohit-devel-list] Planning to drop Reserved Font Name (RFN) from OFL.txt

On 27 December 2012 15:23, Richard Fontana <rfontana(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:04:12AM +0000, Dave Crossland wrote: >> On 27 December 2012 08:57, Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> 2. Added Trademark line in COPYRIGHT file >> I am very confused - this contradicts the idea of dropping of the RFN. > That statement itself seems to contradict something you said on this > list on 6 December 2012 regarding Overpass: > > If 'Overpass' is considered a valuable Red Hat trademark, I'd > personally suggest declaring trademark notices alongside copyright > notices for both licenses. > > (unless I misunderstood it). > > In any case, I don't see a contradiction. The RFN is used to add a > trademark-like copyright condition to the OFL. The trademark notice is > just a trademark notice. Right - but Pravin said, >>> we have decided to drop RFN from Lohit fonts. which suggest removing trademark notices also.