Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation
On 3 October 2013 16:34, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 17:15 +0530, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With
> this font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not
> available earlier. [2]
Sorry to pick old emails, I have a devel@ backlog currently.
Just a plea to please be very conservative introducing new packages (and
hence extra size) to the default set, as both the DVD and desktop live
images are currently (Alpha, and Beta TC1) oversize and need trimming. I
think we should aim to have sufficient font coverage for all practical
out-of-the-box Fedora usage, but try and do so as efficiently as
possible, at least as long as we're sticking to current image size
targets. Thanks!
Yes, do agree with.
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-lisu-fonts</packagereq>
-> 12K
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-mandaic-fonts</packagereq> ->
20K
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-fonts</packagereq> ->
20K
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-tagalog-fonts</packagereq> ->
16K
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-tai-tham-fonts</packagereq> ->
36K
<packagereq
type="default">google-noto-sans-tai-viet-fonts</packagereq> ->
20K
Above are the packages added to default install list of Fedora from
google-noto-fonts, i believe these are important and we don't have
substitute for them in existing default fonts list packages.
Regards,
Pravin Satpute
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.3 KB)