Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya font licensing

Dear sirs, I've just noticed your Nepali fonts on http://madanpuraskar.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&am... The Fedora Linux project, of which I am a community contributor, would very much like to generalise support for all world languages in our free Linux OS and its derivatives (from commercial Red Hat Entreprise Linux to charity One Laptop Per Child). That includes Nepali. If your intention is also to further Nepali support, we'd be very happy to help you spread your fonts wide. However, we are very careful about not misappropriating other people's work, and only distribute material which licensing is clear and compatible with our distribution model. Please add some licensing information to your fonts so we can check if that's the case here (the simplest system is to publish a .txt file stating the license next to the font files, for example in the same zip archive; adding the same information to the font metadata is also good but a .txt file is simpler on users). If you've reused any other font when creating yours (for example, to cover the latin unicode blocks) please document it too (the usual way is through a fontlog .txt file). Our licensing constrains are explained here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts We've found out that the OFL or the GPL with the FSF font exception are the best licenses to use with fonts currently. They're the most clear to users, protect authors solidly, and do not have the awkward side-effects of other licences. If investigation shows our distribution models are incompatible, we'll respect your decision, abandon the idea of integrating your fonts and not bother you anymore. Sincerely, -- Nicolas Mailhot Fedora Fonts Special Interest Group