fonts package naming guideline

Nicolas brought up the point recently in a font package review that we should standardize the naming of our fonts packages to improve consistency. The proposal is to name all source packages in the form "*-fonts". If we agree on this then I think the Fonts Packaging guidelines should be updated to explicitly reflect this policy. Here is a list of our source packages that do not currently end in "-fonts": These old fonts packages should be renamed I guess: fonts-ISO8859-2 -> ISO8859-2-fonts? fonts-KOI8-R -> KOI-R-fonts? This should probably change: fonts-hebrew-fancy -> fancy-fonts? (from culmus.sf.net) thaifonts-scalable (upstream name) -> thai-scalable-fonts? The following are already in the process of disappearing from rawhide: fonts-arabic - pending removal fonts-hebrew -recent devel dead.package fonts-japanese - renamed to japanese-bitmap-fonts today A few others (*font*): efont-unicode-bdf -> unicode-bdf-fonts? (maybe better to replace with GNU Unifont?) freefont (maybe this too?) terminus-font -> terminus-fonts? 3, TeX fonts Probably TeX fonts are outside this discussion?: (tetex-fonts-hebrew, tex-fonts-hebrew, tetex-eurofont, tetex-font-cm-lgc, tetex-font-kerkis) Did I miss any? :) Jens