A quick check indicates that ALL <admon/...> blocks are simply gone, see
e.g. missing block in cron jobs section [1][2] or all the examples in
crypto-policies [3][4].
That is a lot of crucial information missing, unfortunately.
Christopher
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CronFiles/#_cro...
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CronFiles#Cron_job_file_names
[3]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/...
[4]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CryptoPolicies#C.2FC.2B.2B_appli...
On 7/25/2019 6:00 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le jeudi 25 juillet 2019 à 10:16 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit
:
> Thank you for pointing this out. Looking at the initial conversion
> of
> that page from the wiki into git
> (commit8a2c101fb5677dca34e764208893b34daee753bc from 2018-09-21 ,
> that
> admon block simply isn't there. I do not know why, as it seems to
> have
> been in the wiki page source at the time (added in 2013).
Asciidoc convertion of admon blocks was bungled.
I'm working right now on another guideline part where the central
concept, that was in an important admon block was just replaced with
empty lines.
Since I'm rewriting the page now, and intend to push the result soonish
to FPC, I won’t fix the conversion, but I wonder how many Fedora
guidelines have been purged of important parts.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.