about sendmail
by Ritesh Yeole
Dear All,
I am using sendmail on Fedora .
I want to send a mail with attchments .txt or .doc or .zip
then i block it or it ask for permission for send .doc or .zip or .txt file
Plz tell me the solutions or any idea about it ./
Thanks In Advance
Ritesh
16 years, 3 months
Re: Good bye
by Christopher A. Williams
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:22 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
>
> > Anyone care to wager how long before he pisses off the Ubuntu crowd...?
>
>
> and the ubunutu lists are rarely seen with bullshit scatterbrain trash
> like your comments and the hundreds of others saying" go on go then your
> more suited to that crowd" and that attack anyone who supports anything
> else, that alone shows most of you are single minded sour faced twats.
>
Don't you just love it when people quote you out of context for trolling
purposes...
Hmmm.. Where's the rest of my original post..? Oh yea, here it is:
> I know quite a few Ubuntu guys. A couple are friends and co-workers.
> Most are just pro-Ubuntu as opposed to anti-Fedora. Just like most
> people here are pro-Fedora as opposed to Anti-Ubuntu. I'd say it was
> more just a matter of time...
As someone who actually uses BOTH fedora and Ubuntu on a regular basis,
I'd say either you missed the point or you're trying to put words in my
mouth to continue trolling. Nice... And based on your other posts to
this list and thread I see from you, I suppose we'll see more of this
kind of low quality stuff from you.
Since polite requests made to you to stop / unsubscribe are being
ignored, I guess I'll just have to follow the crowd and add your address
to my ignore list - on BOTH Fedora and Ubuntu.
--
====================================================
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is.
--Yogi Berra
16 years, 3 months
What is going on with Eclipse, and PUP?
by Dan Thurman
======== Eclipse ===========
I have posted several posts in regards to Eclipse and it seems that no one has
been able to address it.
I have complained that the latest Eclipse will not work. It does not even
come up at all and eclipse points you to your ~/.eclipse log file of which it
appears that PDE is not working and that there are several files missing.
I have completely removed eclipse from my system (as far as I can tell) and
then re-installed the BASIC eclipse offered via Package Manager and yet it
tells me the same thing, check the log files, same errors.
Can anyone tell me why there is silence on this? Am I in the right mailing
list (For users of Fedora) regarding Eclipse or do I have to report elsewhere
like (Fedora Develop Java) list which I did anyway whilst this mailing list
shows very little or almost no activity for several days?
========= PUP =============
I have followed the instructions in fedorafaq.org which adds the livna and
other repositories - so the PUP update says:
xine-lib-extras-nonfree - 1.1.10-1.lvn8.i386 updates xine-lib-extras-nonfree -
1.1.9.1-1.lvn8.i386
Applying this update results in:
Dependency Error:
Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.10 is needed by package
xine-lib-extras-nonfree
Do I ignore this update until the dependency library becomes available at some
point in the future?
Thanks-
Dan
16 years, 3 months
Re: Good bye
by Antonio Olivares
--- Res <res(a)ausics.net> wrote:
>
> A large part of the reason for EOL'ing all fedora is
> the bullshit politics,
>
I am with you here! :)
but I can tell you of a Fedora that never goes EOL, it
always gets updated and when something occasionally
goes down, there many kind people of the fedora
community that help out and fix it. They bring the
next fedoras to life which are the ones that with the
EOL problems.
The Fedora version that never gets EOL'd is called
rawhide. It works and you do not need to worry about
politics just help in testing. Just tag along for the
ride. Testers are always welcome :)
>
>US-self-created-world-domination-laws-that-are-even-ignored-by-the-EU,
> and lastly but by no means least, poor QC.
>
Everybody makes mistakes. No one distro is the best
in everything. I see errors made by all distros.
However, like you have mentioned mission critical
servers Slackware/RHEL/CentOS or others fit the bill
better. If users out there use Fedora for that there
are no guarantees that everything will work with every
update.
> --
Regards,
Antonio
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
16 years, 3 months
pictures in linux openoffice writer dispeared in windows word
by L
Hi,
I created a document using an openoffice writer in linux. I copied
some pictures from web sites, paste to this ducument, then saved as,
eg, windows word 2000. When I opened this word document using windows
word, the pictures all dispeared. but there were ok if it was open
using openoffice writer in linux.
how to fix this?
Thanks
Yua
16 years, 3 months
Re: Good Bye
by Alan Gagne
Is has been so amusing watching the trials and tribualtions of [ INSERT
NAME HERE] that
I may need to join the Ubuntu list so as not to miss an episode.
Alan
16 years, 3 months
About ssh login
by Ritesh Yeole
Dear Sir,
I want to ssh to my client ,there is sonic-firewall .
In firewall static ip nat with server ip
Now i want to ssh it then it ask for password but when passwd put is says=
[root@ndtest ~]# ssh ultra
root@ultra's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
root@ultra's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
root@ultra's password:
Permission denied (publickey).
=================[root@ndtest ~]# ssh raisoni
root@raisoni's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
root@raisoni's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
root@raisoni's password:
Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password).
[root@ndtest ~]#
Plz tell me what is difference between them and how it is solved.
Thanks
Ritesh
16 years, 3 months
Re: Good bye
by Craig White
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:22 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
>
> > Anyone care to wager how long before he pisses off the Ubuntu crowd...?
>
>
> and the ubunutu lists are rarely seen with bullshit scatterbrain trash
> like your comments and the hundreds of others saying" go on go then your
> more suited to that crowd" and that attack anyone who supports anything
> else, that alone shows most of you are single minded sour faced twats.
----
while I agree that this entire thread is largely unnecessary, I do want
to give you thanks for elevating the conversation...not
Craig
16 years, 3 months
F8 rescued fails on FC7?
by Michael D. Berger
On my dual boot laptop with WinXP and F7, if I try
to start from the F7 rescued, it appears to run
properly. However, with an eye toward installing F8,
if I boot from the F8 rescued, it hangs after printing
the line:
running /sbin/loader
The downloaded rescued iso passed sha1sum, and I tried
it with two different burned disks.
!!Now while typing this, perhaps five minutes later, it
suddenly started correctly!
So what took so long?
Thanks,
Mike.
16 years, 3 months
onboard NIC: Attansic L2
by Dan Thurman
Folks,
Motherboard: P5GC-MX/1333, onboard Attansic L2 NIC chip
Earlier I reported a nightmarish experience trying to get my onboard Attansic
L2 NIC working after compiling the source code for it, installing it, and so
on and could not figure out why the NIC was not turning on the phyiscal link.
I think I understand the symptoms but not the underlying cause.
I reported in my earlier post, that I blamed the twisted pair cable but it
turns out this was not the problem. The cabled is fine. I had to go to my
garbage can to retrieve the cable I almost threw out.
I can repeatedly prove (at least to myself), that under a multiboot situation,
if you boot using w2000/XP, M$ turns ON/OFF/ON the link when coming up and
when it is shutdown/rebooted, it disables the link. It somehow turns the NIC
OFF on reboot/shutdown.
When you bootup Fedora, Fedora goes along as it normally does, probes eth0,
but FAILS to turn ON the link. You CANNOT get Fedora to bring up the link no
matter what you do. The ONLY way to get the link back is to physically power
off the power supply because the motherboard always get's it's power unless
the PS itself is turned off and until the power drains out.
Only then, you can bring up Fedora's OS and get the NIC link to work.
I wonder if M$ plugs microcode into the Attansic L2 chip that renders Fedora
unable to turn on the link OR the code is missing from the Fedora networking
process to turn ON the link.
Can someone in development look into this and let me know what is going on?
At the moment, I have a temporary solution for now but I'd like to make sure
no other helpless chap faces this problem like I did for weeks trying to
figure this out.
Regards,
Dan
16 years, 3 months
