Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> However, I see no evidence that this is
>> intentional on the Fedora teams part. Nor do I see how it would
>> benefit them from exhausting energy into blocking things.
> Whether it is a benefit or not depends on the user experience they want
> to generate. Who would it harm to provide instructions for installing
> common and needed vendor-provide drivers, for example? Is it necessary
> to be hostile to both your own users and the best hardware vendors, or
> the company that invented java and wants to give it away?
Instructions from say the community since Fedora is a community based
distribution?
*
fedorasolved.org
*
fedoraunity.org
If some entity in the community provided a repository containing, for
example, the Nvidia drivers that many users need, could said entity get
their repository configuration included in this "community based
distribution" to make installation automatic?
I think you're way offline with considering lack of support for
this
that you did not pay for with being hostile.
And I think it is reasonable to compare it to other distributions like
ubuntu instead of just assuming that the hostility should push users to
the for-pay version conveniently provided by a related company.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell(a)gmail.com