On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:31:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:44:48AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I think we should take a look at other changes that are in the queue
> for F23 with an eye towards unexpected surprises like that.
In the last two releases, watching changes and the communications
around them, I think we often have this kind of failure of
expectations. We (Fedora in general) need to continue to work on that.
Often, change-filers expect that by having their change accepted, it's
now on everyone else. And conversely, often other groups feel like
the change owners should have covered everything. That ends up being
more adversarial than it should be.
I think it's good to think of the filed Changes as a communications
vehicles but not the complete communication itself. The change owners
*should* be more active about starting discussions with affected
groups, but aren't always experts on what those effects might actually
be, so it's important for others to do exactly as you say — make sure
to keep an eye on changes as they're filed.
I think this is a good general responsibility for the WG FESCo liasons —
watch the changes as they come in and make sure the rest of the WG is
aware. Of course, that doesn't mean that others can't watch too.
Yes. I had told Matthew I would mention this change to the WG
yesterday but since I was in non-stop meetings 9am-6:30pm, I didn't
get to it. Looks like it wasn't a blocker since people found the
Change, and AIUI Allan is talking with the devs to see what can be
done to make this Change workable across Fedora including Workstation.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com