On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet(a)amorsen.dk> wrote:
Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org> writes:
> I'd imagine that running the "live Anaconda" UI from inside the GDM X
> session wouldn't take significantly more resources than the Anaconda
> OS after creating an image that doesn't have games, etc.
Images sound significantly more difficult to create and maintain than
kickstart-files.
I would really hate to lose kickstart.
No one's suggesting replacing kickstart, actually I think we way
undersell it. What I'm talking about is the mode where the image
boots directly into Anaconda as a complete OS should instead be a live
image with Anaconda as an application, which for the most part would
be the same except you'd gain the ability to run say Firefox (or any
other app; games), or do "yum install" during the install.