I think that would make sense. Christian, what are the requirements
here? Do we have to ship the flatpak repositories in a disabled state,
similar to the rpm repositories where they are enabled=0?
--
Kalev
On 03/20/2018 04:02 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote:
Couldn't we use the same RPM for the flatpak repositories then?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com
<mailto:kalevlember@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 03/20/2018 03:03 PM, Christian Fredrik Schaller wrote:
> I would recommend people to go over the requirements and work with 3rd
> parties to propose further applications to include. We accept package
> proposals that are either in RPM or Flatpak format.
I don't think we have a mechanism to add third party flatpak repos right
now. We have fedora-workstation-repositories package for shipping rpm
.repo files (and support for it in gnome-software), but nothing
equivalent for flatpak remotes.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
desktop-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:desktop-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org