I too like the current bootloader. Admittedly, in the interest of
"average" users (like me) the described idea doesn't sound too bad. I
for one don't pay much attention to which kernel I'm booting; I just
select the most recent one.
On the other hand, sacrificing functionality for prettiness is rarely a
good thing in my book. I suggest we instead give people /choices/ as
opposed to forcing defaults - what's not broken shouldn't be changed at
this point, and if people want to modify their bootloaders, the least we
can do is make it a little easy for them. Some prepackaged solutions
with well-written documentation should be enough to pacify most people,
I think?
On 03/11/2013 02:13 PM, Lynn Dixon wrote:
I actually like the current bootloader, and plymouth loading screen.
Having a bland, grey interface that only shows me high level
information such as "Fedora, Windows 8" etc is not my idea of
progress. It also give me instant view into which kernel version I am
booting. I admit I sometimes get a kernel update without noticing it
until I boot and see it in the grub menu.
I just dont see the point of changing a functional bootloader
interface to be plain and gray. Nor do I see the point of getting rid
of the Fedora logo / plymouth filling in, in favor of bland "spiny thing".
I am in agreement with the previous replier: My first reaction would
be to curse the person whom changed a functional bootloader into a
whack-a-mole attempt to find out what the heck is going on.