Em Quarta, 7 de Julho de 2004 00:05, Bernd Groh escreveu:
>Also, maybe the quality step mail should mention who was the
translator
>involved?
Agreed. Maybe the translator should be left in place even? Maybe even
still have the right to make changes, even though the module is in QA?
Would that be desireable? Or rather not?
What I found weird was that after I had commited changes I received the mail
saying that, and I thought, who commited that?
If it said that ir was "morais" I would have noticed "uhm, it's the
stuff I
commited".
--
Pedro Morais - morais(a)kde.org -
http://www.rnl.ist.utl.pt/~pmmm/