Le 13/09/2016 à 17:12, jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr a écrit : oh, I haven't notice it was a mailing list discussion ;) sorry for a so short answer! Here are three little graph about contributors : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:VFAD_F25_Statistics-Zanata.ods * We need to understand what the Brazilians did, they have really weird stats on three users : danniel, zdenek and fredlima. It can be normal, but having a one sentence explanation is mandatory for an article.

Hello First of all, many thanks for shared stats. I didn't participate in Brazilian translation but Czech :-) Do I have really weird stats for translation activity? Well, the translation "action" took 7 days (from 3rd to 9th Sep including both start and end days) - my translation average rate was about 2000 words per day for 5 days. Exception was Friday when I had around 250 words only. Another exception from my average translation activity was on Tuesday when I had about 5000 translated words - I finished translation of "Anaconda (F25)" project and I used these translated sentences for unfinished "Anaconda main" project as well (so mostly copy / paste action because the phrases are (with some exceptions) the same in both projects). Thanks that I had got double of average translation rate I normally had. Thanks all of that I went over 15k words in total (without copy / paste action I would have about 10k words). Back to Brazilians and their superb translation activity. Well, based on provided stats, the highest numbers were given for approving the existing translation. That means someone had to read and approve what was already translated. I would say this is a bit faster activity then translation itself. So I believe they could make it even if it is crazy amount of work :-) Last but not least, this was not a standard week of translation activity. It wasn't at least for me. That's why it is called "sprint". And I did my best to run like Forest :-)) -- trans mailing list trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org

[...] * Surprisingly, ANACONDA is in position 24/31 with only 9 languages at 100% ! This is _very_, _very bad_, for f24 we had 21 languages at 100% ! (my source is an extraction from 1st june 2016)

2016-09-13 23:16 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr&gt;: > * Surprisingly, ANACONDA is in position 24/31 with only 9 languages at 100% > ! This is _very_, _very bad_, for f24 we had 21 languages at 100% ! (my > source is an extraction from 1st june 2016) > > => we should accept to lose half of installation tool languages for a new > release. > This has been caused by the weird anaconda/main/extra split (or more precise, duplication) that occurred earlier this cycle. The new "main" file is actually the existing "anaconda" file minus one string, which is in "extra". The developers didn't merge existing translations to main and extra, so the result is 50% completion on many languages. [...]